AFFAIRS IN TrtE dlTY. of the Huklpal RwroI?*tt?n. m mayoh's cojcplaint book ? t*m polio* a? TVKN8, WTO TSc complaints juttidij were wither so numerous mat M Wed u heretofore. Th. following U takon from Ik* return* WHAT TH* PBOPLK BAT. That tb? ori.hiQ" about the wharves i re allowed to ?taal large lumps of cosl Irvm coa. cart#- praying that poller aim be detailed round the piers. That a liquor stare, 130 fro-by street, iu frequented by f-"f ol young men on Sunday laat. That a white dust ariaea from tne factory in Sixteenth ? tree t, near Seventh avenue, and la deposited in the ad jacent yard*. That boy* are in the habit of annoying the occupants ?f 13 Crosby street, by throwing sticks and stones, break tea windows, Jtc. That a pile of bricks m front of 14 Lexington avenue obstructs the street. That 441 Broome street is a disorderly house. That boxea, fce., in front of 246 and 243 Kignth avenue obstruct the view of the street. That a lienor ? tore in Sixth avenue, between Forty iourth and Forty fifth street, was kept open laat Sunday. That Eleventh avenue is in a dangerous condition, at tka corner of Forty -fourth street, caused oj the sewer running through Forty fourth street, fromlenth avenue to the North river ? it be.ng left without guards or light at night. That lot* on the northeast corner of Forty -fifth street aad Eleventh avenue are filled with water to the injury ?f adjou itig premises That the liquor store on the eorner of Seventh avenue and Twenty -sixth street was kept open last Sunday. That the "Hen and Chlckena," corner of Broidway and Fulton street, has been kept open during the last two Sundays. That in spite of the arrest of F. P. Harris and O. TlomjuiD, editors aud publisher* of the tfruati.vay be He, or an indecent article in that production, the earn* is now being sold in Nassau street by half a dozen sagged urchins. In this matter the Mayor ordered the persons who are crying the Broadway Belle tor sale to be arraated forttt with ANONYMOUS COMPLAINTS. (om|lalLt< havm,< no siguatsre^ am da.ly received, but no tiOtice taken oi tlieiu. leist us wishiag In have rtieir complaints not.i ei m iSt append their names and Nsidenci s inert t? The annexed is a ?pe:im-tn of one of tnoee complaint* letirreit to: ? "Mr Thompson, Tenth street, between First avenue and aviue a, says ttiat the <tay aft r t lie ordinance the a h man probably called and removed the a>be* from the h>lt, s nee w ..en be has retus?d to look at tliein, uul'-i? piitei mi tM sidewalk, where they are upset and tne ?ts el? carriei. away . Had a box and tut) pinned on Wednesday last. Went to ill- station bouse, say they ?aotiot help me. except by a tine, in caw th* a?nes are thrown ruto tut ? net bpoke to the ashinao, who ?as a kind ot a blind liu'.chman, and says le no -unjer deri-t nil.' " Thieves and beggsrs ab"uud In these diirgms aud are great on a?ii ooxes door rugs and m.t's. ined to steal tbe coverings to tue g'atiugs; didn't sutoeeJ. Tbinks they will eim- hack SKkiu, but hopes not until spring. Keeps a servai t expressly to wait n toein ao<t tuu %su niaL. Expects ?oim line morning to wake up and llud his I keep oi aging. WHAT the police say. First Ward ? Lumps opposite 43 and 44 Wall rtro-t ?ot lit. Large hole in sine /rait opposite 'JO Ureeuivich street. .Second Hard ? Hole in South street, oppos te Burling ?lip, uKo opposite 52 Ferry street. fytk Ward. ? <<as lamp corner of Beach and Green wiclt street-* not lit. N\*lk Ward.? The crosswaUs corner ef Hud ion and Chruw pher, and Hudson and I'erry streets, in a very bad ?eixli Ion Hue teruh Ward.? Sewer in Fifteenth street and Seventh avtn e >?. :t (lauuerous conn lion. ath IU id. ? Gas lamps not lit. in root of No* 20 and 40 West Twenty first street, also, northwest oor otr of Twentieth street aul Filth avenue, one lain j out is Hxth avenue, between Nioeteentu and Twentieth streets. Tutntyfirtt Ward. ? Croton pipe In the house of en glae company No. 46 burst. Interesting Meeting of the Board of Ten (governors. PROPOSITION TO HA VIS >0 CLERGYMAN OS fll.ACK WKLl'8 ISLAND? 1 UK LKOIHt.AHtKK TO HK ?UH MS11KD WITH LIQUOR ? ?tO V KR.NOK DKAPHK AND 1HK TKM * KKANCK QUESTION, KTC. A meeting of be Board of Ten Governors vat held y?.s Vrday in th> Rotuniia, in tlie I'ark, at 4 P. M ? Guver nor lowntend, Pre?ldent, In ttie Chair. Present ? Gut" eroes West, Smith, lirapor, Degro, Duke, Taylor, and Tirwinn. The minutes of the last meeting wan rea I aud approved alter which the U" ual re^u.xitionD were read and agreed to. * LIBRARY IN TUB WORtUIOUSB. A rommui icatton ?? received from the Saperio. eni'eLt of the Workhouse reporting favorably to the sa/fiitinu i.f tbe Govt mors, pa-red at last meeting, in reference to h&viug a l.brary in tbe institution, under hia charge Cot. Tikman movtd that the Hum of S500 be appro prlattd for that purpose. After some conversation it tu agreed to refer the subject to the Committee on Workhoute tc r< port at next meetiog A DKBATK ON RBUUIO*. A communication was received from the Warden ?f the Almshouse informing the Board t!iat Father Rotxivt Kleireidam, the Romau Onth'>l c chatillo km? be> n withorawn. aud Kaluer l'b-M Hialv?.i-i tuter1 in his place, The Warden wishen to '.now whether he should continue to pay the salary as usual, lb s elicited cou.-iderable discussion Gov III kc objected to recognizing the appolnt-nent. He was opposed to any appointm-ut being ie;oguix?d that haa not Ixeo made by the Boar ). If this was allowed. Pope 1 t?s IX, or Bedim, might reml the r agents to our institutions ^uch a course would be haute to great abuse. I'h? totr I should lie ?.ar.ifiil and wit allow any our but themselves to appoint officers to the institution under their charge. Gorernor Tucmax thought it was necessary for some elergt man of that lait b to be on the .slant, an'l he did not know but that this Father Frady was as good as tar other priest. Governor Taylor was of opinion that the expenditure ?f $1,100 a year for minister* on Bla k well's isiaod was useless, insomuch ? there could be plen'y of clergymen procured who would be wdliog to perlorui the duties for ?othitg Gorernor Prapk* knew of some churches who did send ministers to the i?laud to tea h their own peculiar d .g ?M. Governor Taylor submitted the following at a later atege ol the meeting: ? Resolved, Tbat this Board discontinue the praitice of feylcg ministers ?f the gospel for professional serrires so the inmates on the island, and that the present min isters lie discharged forthwith. Governor I iRArmi wai opposed to this resolution. It was jnst and proper to furnish these poor people with the consolation* of rel.gion on the r deathbed. Nine tenths of the persons nml?r :usrge of the Board on the Island and in the institutions were Koman Catholics, and tb* y require some one of their own persuasion to Bolster )o them . Gcveroor In k> said that it was an argument against tbe employment ol clergy ten of toat denomination if ?k> mar y of their Hock tcuud their way to BlackweU's island. After some further discus ion. the nonsuit-ration of the ? r.bject was postponed until next mating. A HJ9-I.KV0IH ON niAOKWRIX'a BLA VD. Governor lm ir?n moved the following RmpM, Th.it a -oinmtttee composed ol' on" from each ?f tb>- < cmniittees on the various fnsti'utio.is oo t>ie islnnd, l?e appointed to make a; plication tu the Croton Bonn, to aid the construction of a reservoir ?c Mac welt's Island, tod repo >. plans and estimates for tee Immediate construction of the same. Carried. "kjmjixu PArrKia in ths cocntry. By Ck?T. Daarat ? Resolved , That the superintendent el Outdoor I'oor, require a book to be plaeed with tie clerks in each department, containing the names if such a? are dssirous of obtaining empioymcat, with a lull description of the age, name trade or einp1oym?Dt prs vieusly engaged in tngetner with sncb oth-*r de ais as be Blight dfem important, and the same be epen lor *p plirai.ts or peiscns s<?sing help. l'his resolution, after some explanation was p it and earvied. It appears its objects Is to facilitate the emi gtal on of paupers aaU discharged oonTicts into the country. n RMMII.vr, UPlllYO*' BOOMS A request ftora one of the recently appointed matrons vaa read, sating the Board to furnl-ii her room n a pteier maaiier. Ikia applirst on was resisted by Gorernor Tie in kn on tLe ground that it wa< an improper waste of the fiin.ls to be spending them m furnishing tlie apartm 'uts of emplotees. Ninety live dollars was at length appro iriated, by a TWtS of 6 to i, to defray the espenss of M.iag i ut tbe rooms as desired IIKI.MIKN a SHI TANTM AT HBU.KVl'K nOsPtTAU Gorernor 8*rrH, from the . om-n ttee on !l?llev as R.?s pital. made a lengthy re.xirt on tne affair" of tliat in stitution Complaints hid been made tltttth* ts< n ants and O'lin ?, who are all or nearly all pa iper* and coaTicta, were remiss in their atten lanoe, an I th<- physi etas* baJ not power to discharge them should they so Mrs. Governor Smith offered a resolution te the effect that t.e Warnen be lnstrti>'tHl to discharge drunaen or ua aith'ul assis ants, at the request of the physicians This was opposed on the grouu I that it win Id be ati.pping tbe Warden of allpuwer and making him sub aernent to the medical staff. Governor Drsn staled that one of the doctors had told bim that in his ward therv was only one assistant wb* was aot a drunkard, a thief or an i ll r. They could act be tlspei'ded on to 'urnish m?d cine' to the ant. Governor Tikxavn was asUiniahed at what be had beard. It surely was not possible that the destitute a.ck were left to the voder mercies of this claae of people. He offered the following ? Resolved. That the Standla* Cnmmttee on Believne Hospital be requested to consmor the propriety of *m> ploying competent aasis'ants and nurses, lu place of the paupers at present la that institution. Laid over for further consideration. SCtKlfOHS ANI> PHYSICIANS TO TAX Tlirt* OWT ROARTI. A communicat on was received fr<im the wxrden of IMlerne Hospital, asking for a higher re?iuneration for Koarding tbe phya elans and surgeons at that institution. He new receives $3 40 per week, a mm whlci be doemi Insufficient. It was at leafth reeolve<] that the request of Mr Daly be referred to the committee oa Bailerue Hospital, etio should inquire Into tbe propriety of euttiag off tbe board ?f physicians in tke institutions, aad making thetn aa/lt themselves. It was alleged that plenty of students could be found who would fee willing to aaoapt the birth for the prac tice it f ??? them thk immiBM to hav? ma uqcoa? unio.tiiioK or GOVKRJfOH DKAPUl. Got. Tint auk mured tbe following: ? RmoItiI, That at the entertainment to b? given to tha (level nor and l-egialatuie of thia State no iplntuoua or vinou* liquor* ?hall be furnished. This exciteu considerable feeling in the Board, tha lnembara looking quite pu tiled (iofurur WkaT waa opposed to the resolution. He did not think It proper for the Board, alter inviting tneir guests, to uj what they should, or what they should not, give them Governor Imam didn't tniak it altogether proper to eouflne tbe legislature to cold water. It waa well rDough for any one to profeaa temperance principles, bat not to force then oo other people, some person < could not help being water drinkers, aa their aonatitution could not stand wine or liquor Govtrnor Ilium referred in bitter terma to tha letter o < the Bon Charles C. l-eigh, pubii-bed in the Nkw Vokk HiiiLiU), in wliich the ten uovernor* wore cturged with ftaatiog certain paruea until tbey were shamefully drunk. He denied that such an occurrence tooa place on the Inland. He was a contemptible humbug w jo said so. When these crawling reptiles uudertook to take away tbe good name of respectable meu, they abould be frowned upon by tbe whole community. If be (Mr. I r.i p. r ) could only get those libellers face to face, m would expose th< ir contemptible conduct. He continned to oenouuee the i- mper-me men end particularly C. C Leigh, in ibla strain, lur aoiue time Governor ltusaN urged the passage of tbe resolution at come length, on the grouuu ttiat it woul' I be to tbe credit of the i.oard to ilo so. Various auienumebta were then offered; but tliey were voted down, aim tbe resolution waa llnally lost by the follrwicg vote: ? AYH ? 1'use, Tiemanan and Taylor. Nvkf ? lownsend, Hi apt r West, Smith, De^ro aud lay'oi. Ihe following communication ??- then read: ? In okmak Jan 33, I8'i5. Resolvtd, That the Nile tCouim ttee on -o m i hofttie Governors message as rela.es to t'.e subject of tutem peiance be authorize*! and requested t? cad upoo tbe Mayor* (.Lit la o( l'olue. a o Police Justices, of our cities and villager anil upon ihe wardens and keepers ol prisons almshouses, and other puMij institution.'!, for si.cb infoimi.tidn a- they may be ante to ojiuuiuuicate, s owing tbt iritliieu<e ol lulein^-rauie in causing critu?, pauperism, and taxation in this Mats, liy order, H.J HAMTl ins, Orfc.. CiKNT ? Pursuant to the fo, going resolution you are resptctluUy requested, at your earliest convaa ence to prepare un.i transmit as lull ai.d definite answer* aaeir stances w>li adm:. to *ne lollowiu/ interrogator!*!,, orlo as msuy ot them as f?U willr.n your knowledge or ob strvaurn: ? 1. iinw many |>era?n? weie arr-sted in your city, or county, daring the last year ,naix<Ml witu crime/ And what proportion ot tbem were per-ous of intemperate habits ?- How mauy persona were committed to prison in your county, charted with tee eouiiuissiou of crane, during Uie la^t year/ Aud liow miny ol theui were per sou.! of ivlemperat) habit* 8. Hnw many person* were received Into tbe alms bouse el your >ounty ihe Us' year' And in respect to liow many ol tliem was int*ni|>eraiice. either their own, ( r their husbands' or patent*', a pruininent cause of their pauper siu/ ?I How uinuy inmate'< ..re there n ilie p blic institu tion or institutions, tinier y"nr car*/ How many men/ How msuy women/ Ho# many ch ldren/ And naw many ol tliem may properly charge luietuperauoe as the c.aup-. direct or Imlireei. ol t'irir prenut m sfortune/ I). What #m tae while am >un" of tbe taxes assessed up' n th> ^ ei.ple of your county, city or 'own, last year / And bow much of that was, la your judgment, caused by iui> n peraiicey "ti Ho* o any |ie(Sous were licensed last year to sell Intoxicating liquors n your count* , city or towulP And ho? m.n li tnouey was received lor their license*.' How niaiy meu, over twenty years of aire, died last year in your city, -ton u. or villager How many of those wete g< tierally reputed to be person* if intemper.ite ha bits/ And ?' lut was tueir *> erage age/ How ninny of tb< in ??re I .no urn to nave ti tally abstained, for live yetra l-a-t Iron* the . . e ot luvoxica.iog m inhsf' And f'^at was their a cersge age/ h I'uritn; tbe last yeur, bow niiay men id }??r town or vilagc, and liow mat > women, bave bad the deliri .m tfeintne, nn;l bow oiaoy of tbem are now alive/ 0 How muny men how ninny woin''i), and how mtuy n.itiors i. re i.oa living ? ?> yo r to<n or village, who <tre gent rally called dei idedly inV'mperate iiersouHi1 10 How many Ismilies are there in your lo*u or 1 1 lage wbo are now ^uller.ug irum iuiemperauce/ Aud how muny cbilcreti aie there in tlict-e families^ I'leaM' give tins h b -r' your mmtdiate attention, and direct y our reply to tt.e Cn-rk ol totf Senate, rty order of the Committee. J H Wll.l lA.'H Ch't-rmiu, fenale Cl amber. Albany January 21. lHi>5. N 11. ? Aoy indi\ i.tual receiving tins c:r ular, who are not occupying otToiul stations are responti ully re qnerted to aid in furni lnug the inforiualiOQ 'leered. Governor li Kt ? tfered the fellowmu hesiueii. I hat Hie n I He rent waroeua tj) wleitn the eom m u u i ration ol the S- lect (iommiltee o!" the Senate of i hie Mate mi the subject "f iniempernnce was refurreil, r? port bow often the s^ui" per-.nn 'uis been committed trom ti e same cause so that the itatiftticii m.iy bo prop erly corrected. The Hoard tb'-n ii jourr.ert. Wl.r.KLV hTfTr.ME.T R llevvie llnspital 776 l.i natic Atvl .m 559 Aln shoii^e 1,411 1 en tenliuiy 5H Hospitnls / 488 VorKliOute .... ...1,145 -mallpox Hoep.UI . . . 2 Km ('ail V 1 land 1,00.1 " Hospital 176 City Tricon* dJO ( oli red Hon e 2H3 ' ioioredOrph.il! Asylum 180 Cbiidf? n at nnr-e 1*2 Total 7,013 lui rease over last year 83 'I liruirtu uuii (exhibitions. I mimdwav Tiiutm. ? ' < md-reua' i? mon in -e l aumn for tbiK otCLiDK. 'e og it* '**1 rnpre?entaii o hut ihree All tbu?e who lnvr u< t feeu ibU Jtiera, which 11.11 b?n pro* need iu p r> *' % pi. uiinr thnuld embrace '.be oily > opportunity the? will Imve lor a long time. The tare* ' hi "IWtKt-y I'a'tor" will n.uclude the inlertamm-n'a ot tbe evening. IKiWIKT ThxaTRK ?The hem-lit of Mrs. J. M. Cook ! tako- |1?.?- tonight ?hfn Mr ano Mm* Charles will ?l I ehr 10 tbe tar e ot the 'Irlub I .ion," at I'lra VI >ore an I Mn H'igtg Mr*. J. M Com. app uri ilk N ino- in tb? drama of the "(iirnn Cock of ihc Wilderness. " The ilrxma of "hixte?n Mrinp Jas>" will al*<> be pitted. l'lnHKror Mci'nrland ? II a?ceud on a wiro Irom nU<e toyallery ? UlliTon'8 TnkATRK ?The hurletta of "Blue lie v la" ci.un.ence* the *uiui*emeutrt ol th<a evening It will \t* follow ? <l ty the new Auieitcau ceiuedy celled "Oar Set," wWli is c*ht to tbe ? otir? utreugth of Burton h coin ] un,>, nod the i? miniating leature will b- toe new i.ran.a o: "Old <\i1?im." K Lr her, Juliritoo and Mixa Ray mond Mi-ta.n the I ading cbarai t-r* HjIUck's Irmthk. ? Tlie gieat Hurcens of Morion's comedy ol 'Town and i>ouutry " Induce" the manage met! to announce it again lor till* eveuing Mr. I<j. tei 'a Keubeu Olenroy lia* b?en *<>okeu of in Mattering terajN Mam*. Kronghain. H.aud and Miss ito<a liennott iu tbe leading cnaracleri Ibe fare of the "New Footman' clote* t.h- riiU rlu omenta of >lie i-veuiug American Mi ski m ?The pl?*ce selected for tb* after noon is the murli t ill ml drama of ?' Black Kyeil *?? ran," lir. J K >coti an W lliatn - nd Mi** M-*'a> er a* 8u*sn The selection lor '.lie evening le Sbake.tp-are's tragedy of "Macbeth " Mr J R. -*;oit aa M?cbe h, Cla-k an Macdull. and Mil* I.e Hruu a- l*dy Mvb-tu CiRCt'tv? Broadway.- San.l?' and Nathan's tine com panic* of equestrian p*rfor?n*-ri announce *i>lenlil laats in the ring for thl? ev. ning Toe amu etn-ntt consist ot single anil double ac s ot horse. n ini'i p vaulting and tunibl.ng. Wood's Mix.htkki.1. ? This h ill i* crowded every even ing, and the p?r oruiarc*s, aa usual tidit tb? utnuet merrimrnt among tbe au n-nce. '* Kobxrt Make Aire" to uigbt. bCCMJnr'a 8it**?i4iiraw ? Th? new burlemiue of " I.ucy ot I ammcricour ' i? a^aio announced fur ihln e?enm<. There will aI?o be var oue negro inelnU>eii ?nd iuKtrumen tal iierlorftianc>-? Hon Ciljipn. ? Mope C'h?p?l in devoted to the perform aue>- of ix-gro minetreUy naucii.g <nrtrnni<-oial pieo-a aad hurleeifuee by Ijonald-ou'e fciliiop au U,ier* 1'roupn. Mn. H<>oi>. the macb ni't of H ickl -y h itp-ra ICou-e, I taken bin h-'etlt 00 .Saturday >'T-ning uett waen it ia } lioje.) h?- frl?nM? w il do thur duty I *fl JrLiKo'e flr?t con -ert at th? Marvt ? id Institute 1 Bait m< re. *ai crowded Another w.il he given thu ?vtnthg Thr Prlwatrrr U?n. Armntront;. TO THB KHITOR OK T1IK II KHALI) In thin mori ing'n IIkkald I noticed *0 irtelefrom your W a?hingt"n rorre-pi.n in.t. ?iailug tb?l a hear.hf 1 would be ha'l in ( ncgre n, fur the r lief "f aiuuel <j. j | Keid, coiniinni.'T of the Arm'troftg. Would you t>e an J en< ugh to inlorm me. 'Iviiinh jour valuabl- j ? irual, aa I am the widow of one o' tne turvWiug tr w ? .f a.iy provision will b?* niaiie tor th" <u. v ion, aa they .i,<i all tbe hyktni|, and abould com? in for an e ja^l guar*, j Com "" ?ppropf ate. I $Ul,o ?? for the r rilief, aim" year- ago at t ? ach tvc-iv. d the ?unil p'.utnca of 4 ?'? of tfce above ?um W'lt t>w'au>e ol t..e h.?lanee, t never b?-ard. I no think equal justice ulioul l be dune to tbe (.rate iu iVed. ap weUa? h"?? who ciriy I he nun* I 1 ? ? ?..k tor n ormat ?o- frvin j?u, who, I think, w 11 rb- arfrllv give it to ooe who kn ? ?a yon are c.i|iat>le, a id 1 al' aye willing to 110 what ia r'x>>t .ml t<*cwi?e tue go il wi?iii-? ot 1 i,e who auk* a -null favor tU.-o ^h ? our vat i 1 ab'e journal. .> 'VMK)?V. j lit tratlramk \ Naw Yoka. Jan IS.1'1. j TO THK KIIITOK Of TUK N?W *o;? IIKKaLII. It baviag appeared la the pa|x-re tint a wa captain o( ! the name of *? MMII, i? c^.ar^i-d wit'i bavtng tMC coa ctrueo ii. the i-lave tra le, 1 beg ot y ju to hw <o ohitgmg 1 1 a- allow me to it- thrinigli your column*, 'hat 1 atn 1 not tLat individual, and, further, that not nog could be to me mwre odioua than any connection or '"ntajt wi:n that lolanon* trade. I ron* oer it the m -r* ne.*ea?ary 1 lor me to m??a tbia ? atenieat, ?lnoe I au. tty protenalon a mariner. Yjnr obedirat ?errant oworc.e FEiii.CTn. The Klrat tairomoUrr. N'kw York. Jao If*. Enrw* ? There la a great arror In r?f?r-o e to the locomotive, McNeil, running between l'a'er?on and Jer sey City in IH'iH, aa that roa<l ?u not coinui-n -e<l mtil ]K>0, and oompleted in the latter part of H.iJ or spring ?fim. Yours. PArKR-toN. A Conktl lc?*nwi.*iKjKD ? Tl? Prval lent h?a Isaned an eieeuator to Francis A. Hoffman, of Chicago as consul for Brunswick and l.nntnhurg, for tbe j>tate of Illinois. LEGAL INTELLIGENCE. loart ?f Cnm?trnFU? ?pecUl JMTOBTAWT DECISION IM RELATION TO BPKCIU. rAHTHMMM. Ja* 29 ? In re La Chain * Faucht m. Lord <f Bntvm and another. ? lbil cm wa. argued U?t weel k, a?d the point* of Uw duly reported. Yeeterday the following opinion and decl.lon ?" rendered Lnokaham, F. J. ? The plaintiff., being creditor, of I>?rd ft Brown, move for an Injunction again.t the part n?.h.p property aad a receiv.r. The complaint .how th. indebtcdneea of the firm of Lord ft Brown te the plaintiff. upon ft note of $1,073 60, that Lord * B*ewn formed a limited partnerahip in December, 1?50, te eon tinue lire years, and that the other defendactMarka, ? a. the special panner, having advance 1 $2?,000 there to that during the existence of the partner.hlp, Mar*, withdrew Irom the fund, of the Brm $18,33# #0. and onuth.n. v "bav .be brm ol Lord ft ilro-u .i nuw m kiiltenl au-i wholly unab.e to pay their dejtt, and have now .n posses-iou thousand dolf have no i~ niua partnership, out of ,r?.h thVv are paying uebt., and giving which Jvtr me debt due to the jlaintiile. ThJ *ue"?u-ni? Lord ft Lrown, do not ? eny the imlebi Z the plaintiff* They admit the imw.veucy ol the him and thai they have iu tour pos-te,8.oa -??of . Jti ol the tirm. They explain the uiouejs paid to . .. 8 lo have been divld?nde oc produ, which they a - We to havt uen mac. in good faith aud atur .UoW u , ?ii I,...,, sustained a' the time* of au'-b dtvi 5^Crt. ur tU^r? ml%i and 'S3, and aver Mat .uob ou.dJd. ??? "ad? from the net produ. 1|?J ??? ti.uL ai. tbe time ol the duaolutiou In July , lbil, I the* believed ihe hrin to have be.uaolveut. ihaton such i??i .in boantit ftfOin delondant, Mark* hia in tSZ ?" ?he arm a- apecial partner, for ln!ch the uotea of Lord ft Hrown were given, payable Iiieralltlie Uabll.ue? ol the special h***f have be' n matured. That UM ft Brown bough, the ai k,iH of th^ uiuiol Loid ?% lirown, (the liin.ted l>*rt"" i \ _ | , . w(.r? duly tran?lerred to them, ami they in " liability lor said purcliaee of $1*0,000, uf wbiuli Jl^. bavetmce paid *"o,0 00 Ihat U.rd ft Broen Ihere i tb*y n H aALeriil odatIuv Nbip to whuti Harka Upo? orintd ? , e failed in Novern L\ ^M ana thatTTere u now aue to the oritur, of th*' hrniled partnership $06,0b0, aud of the genera ? ? t.ni &i i '> ooO I lie v aUo allege the pending uf r'Er *s ^?sJsrsr.r vp ssr? tsu p..... r.uf, i-huriicd an n geueial pariuer, I thiu* in "l*-c PI1 IJwinn about |tiu,iK)0, and by a proceeding to which but litlle value can be attached ?o jar a4 ^e cU.mn ol ere dHnrB are concerned, the whole an->eUof toe tlrm ol lx>id ft lirown, the limited partnership, have been eold / ? k, Krowu the ireneral purtuew, ho *&r a** ap ^ m the evideuce, in confideration of tu-iir agree peaia ir m iiitiHg of the limited partnerihip, ? 1 nUnir to *140 OoO Had such liabilities btwn dis ?!mrged at ?i the creditor, would have Mnkrfofe :r:ss w* Z Sown the meiub- r, of the general partnership, to w llom lkr y claUn .uol. a.aete belong. No such arrauge rnenf cauyM sustained to oepr.vethe erad.tor. o( the limited nartuership <d their "gbt to Innl-it that the ?ss,U0l that bra Khali be appl.ed to the j.j.y^ent of itn an i although the deieudauU may have gone itb'.eot^ aui hiuu K mouey Home of their ha Tl.t e" t bere w i^th' ug in th.t'faci to justify then, iu withholding I rum Hutu creditors the asset* "aJ'^m l lit ir bands, and which under iny ^ c.rcui * ? mute- ebould be applied In discharge o. the liability Jt llTiuuZ" partnership. Thai su;h a transfer be . . .. t|.? hanii' partiea cau bo i-aujt oued as depriving ore their light to follow th ? a, sets ?f tne llnn or t..e di-thaite ol if debts eeems to me . vnrv brmoiple ol jueuce or eituily It ?ay "e, ?na? u,oo a involution of a tl-in, oue paituer oaay mU to tile oilier pariner all In. intere.t in the aweWof the i ru uud ii sucu ir vii suction i? Oona Jide, and tor the mirt ose ol wioiii. g up the aha.m ..I the Urm a cnditor CkbUiit take such pro(*rty from li^nn ooialned a^aust it I . , vr((iitors i*f the partner maaiuglthe puroaa?e. (Ketehum ?? liurkee, 1 Ba% Cly l'r p. ?a.) h dud line cannot bi- extended to sucu a casi as the pre ??nt one ao? l -oubt whether it can be in any e^ ot hm.-e!; partnership. Tbe right to grant eucU mo.xja was settled In lb* caao ol JeM-uovs Laning, 1 I aige, oi4, aud lias been eiuce loluiwed by iheauprome Court, in Wbitewrivht v. ttim^suu, ii Uart 8.0 Kep. dlU. andlhe ruW adonie' In IhTe oas.a as to limited partnership. ?x;ended by Judge Komouu. to a gen?ral partmr Th o!^ LHon vs. Horn ^ Mint,, 5 How. l'r. Itep., o. Ann' win ii it appear? that a ol??o.ution w?* made, or to mane ol the as-etK, In giviug a prel.rence cieditor irte'r auoth. r the provisions ol ihe JlJ'.i ? 0 tbe toile are comprehensive enouKh to warrau . ?u.h a pruceeillng . In the cases, ho. ever, o rtl?i j have reteried, the action wa. comnieuced not for -be brnebl ?l the pirn ntllle solely, but of a. I tpe mwitore of the insolvent firm. The appointment of a i teener in those cases would have sec ir-d the pare iwchiD tunda auu a?fl*tn lor the joiot Owarlltof all ?ad upon ^distribution of such aseet. the cr.- ltor. wouM Lave been entitled equally to sliare ln the pro -eel. I I ei eol l here ia a manliest propriety in reiiuinng ^uth a term of action belore the propeity of tne ttrm vhuu d thus Oe nlaced in the hand, ol tb? re ;eiver Th-re l. no ?<iiTty in taking f.on. a hrm the whole ol their pro ity lo pay or ncurr one individual creditor to the er tl's . u id others Ihe impropriety of thu. pUdng in ti e b^nOiol a receiver the wuole it thi of bini Ui pay a cla m ol ?l,00n, and thereby depriving Oilier creditors amounting to $?!,? ?"i ol pr?!^; i it^s .gainst .ncha-?et. until the first creditor is pa d, ir so n.?nii>->it that it caa require n? argamen^ t^ -Uow tt at it ouijlit not to be doLe. hveu if the plalatilfs were judgment creditor., th?y could only have an order al H>w?og a receiver to take .ultteient oi tie a?i?eti of th. firm to obtain the means of it?schargimr tueir debt, an.1 until tl.e> are judgment cr-dtUirs mere i. no proprwty in itiving them a receiver, unles. in a ca.e where t he ??b.ci ol ruch receivership * U operate to WOUPo all the creditors . f the Urm 1 think, aUo, there le a dlfflculiy iu the prerent action which loruis an oojection to tlw ? rantirg of their motion. It should be required, to war rant cuch an order, that all tbe del, ndantii sought tj W mai e liable as partuern admit the Indebted nea.. rn. delem ant Marks (to ?h ?? auswer I have not below i re; ferret) ) d?ui?tl such indebtedi-ess He denies any join, lo. ebl?ilues. whatever, aud doe. not admit the plain Ull's claims. It he Is .ought to be held liaole a. a de fendant, he certainly does not admit the lodeoteduesa, bat, cn the contrary, bl* answer shows a ?UW ment ol lact. which would, If provtd, entitle him to a verdict. Besides, other creditor, migat not, even if tlie action had t*en commeuoed ^lor all tne ere dilors, have been aiding lo engage in aucb a conteaV It i? uot necetaary ?orm? to pa?s upon the question, aieued be?or?? me a* to the liability of Mark?. Hl? In* buity is dented. If it exist, it i. not admitted, ?> ae t o wananl me In granting thi. motion. It ue w ' not liable it can only be decided at the end o' a protracted litiga tion, and the fund, and aseet. of au luaolvent Brm should nol be tied up from all the creditors for the pur pose of ? nabl ng one creditor to enter into ?uch a con trov. rsv. The granting ol an injunction aud appointing 01 a rece ver in cases of this kind i. aduiittwl by the Chancellor to be in addltlou to the former power, of a ronrt o< equity, and It teem, to me to be proper that the ptiwrr .hould only be exercised where the claim u undisputed, and where the property will a< .peedily a. possible be applied to the uae of the creditor*. Au ob jection ?es made upon the argumeut, and it appear* in tbe defendant', answer that another action I. pending iu this ronrt for the benefit of all tlie crs.lllorrf, and tf at .urh action ?as commenced prior to the present one llie mere existence of ?uch au action, although a trior ote. ha* no effect upon toU motion. Whether prior Ol subeequant in Its commencement, it afford, no ground to ftay proceeding* in other actions, until after a judg no nt has !?een rendered in a ra*i> in which the otier creditor* can comoine and iruke thetnael'e. partie.. After such a jut'gmtnt a motion formerly could be mvle to *t*y proceedings In other suits, so lar a. the appointment ol a rece v. r. This wa* settled by the tliancellnr in imes vs. Uwsin<, before referred to. <7 tiiige 5s;i.) I'hls motion, frr the reasons before y -n tionii^. n -t be denied, with #11 costs, an 1 the Injunc tion dissolved, without prejudice to tbe renewal of it, if ' t ie plaintiff* shail by amr uJmeut obviate th. objeotlon. wlich now eiist, as above stated. Vmt?<l BIiIn lonimlMloiwr'i Court. Before Klchard K. StiUell, Rtq. Tnx ALLKCKD rl.AVK THAI- KICKINM BY Till CAPTAIN or TMK AMKKICAM HCHOONKIt ADVANCE. Jan 'M.? Tke Vnitrd .Haiti vt. Jotrpk t'Uet'i alien Ca/4. Ktafft. ? The <l*f?ndaut in thia cane U a natlev of ' TrlMti, Austria, and i? charged with tratHcking Id ulaeea on tLrCVa*'. of Africa, id th? year 1 ??>.!. There waa a large attendance of foreigaera prcaent. among whom we tared Max Maietaek, the well known Italia* muaical manager, aid several ^rwni who liaO Ixxa examine! no lamer e.mliar inte'tigatluii*. j KayBcnd Kuowlea, examined by the District Attor ixjr, depoaed ? I > m a pianoforte maker; I have worked upon ?ee??U an a carpenter , I wa* on Im.trd the OnitaU Mate* ?hlp ?-ei mantown, on the Coant of Africa, in the tear I wax on h ard of ber from lH60to 1H53; during that time ?be wa- on the leant of Africa; at tha time we w< re on the Uiaat of Africa wa ?>w an American Tea M-t cal'ed the Advance. the examination of thia witnee* wan here nuapendad to ?xairmc t>e ? W Kogere, who wa* obliged to leave town at a o'clock. H? d?|r>eed that be wan a lieutenant In the navy, and aerved in tha lierinantown in 18-2; eh* wan crulaing trim Materia to U>?ud<>, i aaw the Ad vance at Port au I'rata when werameup the caat, tVera waa H int ?u?vicion at the t.metliatalie waa intended for the elave ttade, while lying tlieie ah* eentaahore in try ing to get awty ; I went on hoard of her with a boat'a crew; helped to >et ber off, we did get her off that eraoing, af ter that ah? waa ??*??? an<l aa-nt homo to the I nited St?tea aa a rrlte The Advance waa a auiaJl fore and aft eehnuvvr. ate waa M?ut home un ier the command of pe?*ed niKUIiipmaa Walker, I waa on board the Advance about tea bonra. y. wae on hoard tha A<1v?t<c*T A That* waa* captain and ere?; ?he carried tn. American Hag; I aaw the captain oa board; ?he profeaaed to hail from New Q. Had you eoaveraatlona with the Captain f A. Not hardly at all, I should judge by the little conTenation I bid with his* he vy **7 Z^'T,d * ?? ' *?? onshore.' " "* were tW A SL; ^ W?M ?h?t oouatrymflB =2 t h*" "0m* trouhta about the ctew, and I think he had some neg-rooa looor them &i th#r*; *?? ?" 1? the fall of n m* w,p* ther*' but ' can't tell exactly. 1 ?i 9"/?? ll 18 J?ur ml??d tha month? A. The time l4i u oom-iif "P tha ooaal aad finding that ra thJ^Ul tE*l \ r o'Ooto^i we remained there t.ll tha lit of March, '53; I think ii vu between W time P*rt of 0ctob*r lnd flr,t of December weaaw <J. What ni tha name of tha captain of tha Advance? A. I uLdt-r stood it to be La Krafft or Da Krafft. Q. Do >you recognize that man nowl> A. Myimpres eion la (pointing to tba accused) that ia Captain Kjrafft sitting on the left side of counsel for defendant. Croe* examined by Mr D. B Eaton, counsel for tha ?ccused? The Germantown tailed from tha Unltad ? on the nth of April, 18M ; aba nailed from the port of Naw York undir the com mand of Captain Knight, but carrying Commo dore Lavalette. sha wae tha IU| ship of the African squadron. [Witness described her course ] She first touched the coast ol Alrioa 1st June, 1861: I should call a good passage from New Yort to Port au rrava twenty-six or twenty -eight dajs; you may put it thtrtr ?lay*; it wou.d be hard to leU what tbe time would be Irom New Orleans to Fort au Piaya; it would be a mere guess with me to answer it; the latitude of fort au Praya is more than 14 north. Q. How lar from that port was the Advance when you first saw her * A the was within the harbor: 1 had never seen the vessel before, thatl know of: she had two masts; uiy impression I. that she *a. lea l color: I can not state any more positively us to her color; 1 can state tbat she was colored : it ia my impression that she had a black stripe on her; I see so many vessels, 1 cannot give more than my impression Q. Did you thin* this was a'piratical vessel at the time Jbout't" ' A-ldid'nt think auy thing at aU Q. Lid yon form the impression before she left, that she was a piraticU vessel? A. I did form an impression that she was iutendsc lor the slave trade; there was a name painted on the stern of the vessel; 1 can't tell whe ther the name wa. on the sides, my , npression Is That ?? lrivar,Cr. ?|^*W ,aD8" "ere wntttn after the name th ?frtain ?f that; lam notcertiin that the name of the builder was on her; 1 do uot know th*t lever saw toe name of the builder on a vessel the Dime was painted on a dark color with white' ?? were ne.r the Advance for about a mcntb; 1 do not know where the man (Walker) is who was sent home with the Advance; 1 don't know I <W? VJ ? m 7b0 came holu? witU her ar.; wheU\?T " ?<" our vessel took her or not, the commodore could order any ves.el to take her the Dale and the Uainbndg* wereal*o there: 1 have some recollection thst the captain of the Advance tooa pansage in a vessel, 1 think the William M. Kogers, I do nriTknow tha, he did take passage in her; I weui eD board the Auvunce iuys.it; 1 ctnnot tell when with any oeirreo of accuracy ; t went on board of her when sho we.taXre ? J**" the Bret time I was ever ou board; 1 don't re' member po< tively that I had ever seen the capta'n pre TiOw 8 to t at time; I tmnk it was Novum tor, 1K52 I went IJOn,t th'Uk bit the boat's crew of the l>ermantown camo on board with me; I think there were twelve ol ihem at least; I ean't tell the names of any ol them, nor what boat It was 1 board about three' hours; I w^t in com mand of the boat; my butloesa ou board ol her was together off; 1 mistrusted at that time that -he was fitted up for . slaver; 1 did not take any particular no i *h?t color sne was; I can't tell how many persona I found on board of her; there were more U^nTwo and not an*? 1 1 " ' n dld not 9" *" <lv#r tbe *M<el; I <lid men of thi i l* K ; my men did; Bome of the men of tbe Advamo were black meu, how muny 1 do nat recollect; 1 can t tell how many white men, or tbe names 1C??P\ V t?Pt?iui I beard htm named; I do not *ho. 1 h"r'1 iwm>- Uim; the men were drested in tbe sailor fashion ; my recollection of the captain's name is from general conversation, a- d not Irom a.iy parti iu iVth?C?' C i the Advance was in cousiderab.e danger r,J. Z !me' w 00 ,K"rJ we wer? endeavoring to relieve hei ; there was not much excitement on my D?rt the rap'ain of the vessel himtelf seemed to bo excited - my' Zt W TU 0LKtl the, worked ver> h?/; mypi?y Ad??n!t* Tr,.Chnitrlgluh) UDKaa<?; the ere /of the Advance spoke tbe American language; the captain of I hid n?MC* tpi,k" tn?'l8h w'*11 ? "trou? foreign accent keen conversation eiih him except to tell u>m to der ??V .i uanger of th# ve.xel was iu getting tin derway, there were treaktrs outside ol her the water broke round her that day; 1 can't Uli where I next saw th!tCmv"ln U" ' a" 1 "?'d in my in chief, hLiTi 11 ?" 1 ?,uw >,i/a to-ray (in court)- I think the Al vance sailed for the United mates in that rrrr?,h,; 1 u"n.k ? rre?^ ?n .d.rk frock rout, J never bt>ar?l of tlie uam-< of a j?ea caota n celled Kraflt to my recollection briore, i hare ?een t?ie iiome of Captain K-attt in tbw paper; I never heard the Lame ol any otner of tb?t name nuice then. ? "? ln /'* micst 01 thai excitement diil you take anv Cdre'V "a n. ?f lliUt T4" Wl,b tt v'"w *<? remember .'ress' th. ni., ' ,IUt with a v<*'" to remember h s time my attention was called to identify tl.e captaio since then, whs during the Drcaent m??n, ,n 1 reived a ner ?age from M,g McL^Tllhen had a conversation with Kay mend Knowles on tie matter I can t tell what day, 1 conversed with him two or three times- 1 iau't tell what he sail to me h?t?lked aho!! general matters, about the ^.pUm of the Ad vanre an.l the crew; h? tnld tne that the captain ol the tctooner Advucct was building a hrig- he did not saj wt.al the captain *a? going to do with the brig lie tUt ti'Si dV?"?r#fUm ,',,>0"ed; 1 canuot recrfa'ect tLstte a,., a me D 1 recollected tbe captain- 1 don't t 'lna l.e mentioned the name Krallt. nor do I think I aii nlioned that name either; 1 cannot recollect the Advar r.* k? I"1 Krttl|r' or the capUlu of u;tZe;, r e' '2 " m" he bad given iQf.irm?tion ar to hraftt, i naw bis affidavit n the pai>er>r KiiowIam " cooper; hecontinu the maU ,,f *V "h"'? ?y recollect on of lue mate i.t the Advance is, that !ie was a short stout man, I cannot say whetoer me captain of the Advauce was'an't'tLinlr'fl* h,f "r"l 1 ?*"Dot UU "betUer there . .tm,tt*r w'" ??eof h aeies; 1 did not fo much injurec aa'o destroy* he "aUMl'eSTw^f the J..; revs WM ano r T ,n New "rl#an^ H?com tLere were c'"'r,?r ? T?"#1 to go to Vera Ou*; "?ere were several schooners in port; there was an tt? ?an n^med Uarell,, .?d he Lr^ , ,clmr .f ?frert0w^i" r^t'o^ar^^ e; ^,.(PointiugD,io?he.^u;:.! ;;bie belU'uw^t'r U tn h,??1,"'" ]U:1 UU Sim V 't not bio; I spote ot Si "fit* 10 i'm ab0Mt th# oe'curr^Je oi i lie vessel at New Orleans; he was rami iar with thou lU.^ih'.'i*1"^ 1 certain tacts to me whieii made me be wta?nV??rf"f" pr""Bt; D" Impres.-lon of the person r! c?nHnntd ',<MD conv?r?lng with him. I utTe ,.on doubt 'b*t he Is the inaa f as rcm"n0*r?> ^e fact just as i nave stated it; but in order to be imrfectlv an>L I put several questions to him. which be answered In s^frh a way as to d.ssolve .ny doubt; be rlindl" m. of ^e house and room where I lived In New Orleans and other O^A Drtl ' and'hai P*rJ"Ctl/ J1"* ' left 4U ',t the end Of April, aod had been there a fortnight before riden *tr:&b-??Tg0' tbt ,c,:uM,d ,d abook- ^h,cu Tta case stands adjourned to thla day. Marine Court* Before Judge Phillips and * Jury. Jan. 30 ? Genrge M Vandtrlip vs. Joseph Ste'U ? ThM action la brought to re ;over tiie value of a cylinder print lug preaa, taken and aold by defendant on a chattel mottgage, executed by Theodore H Gray (of vltrio throwing notoriety). It apprara that tha pr?*a waa void lp April, 186M. I>y Gray to one Merchant, and in Novem ber 1854, told by him to plaintiff. On Merchant * De cern ng the owner be hired Uie press to (.ray at |16 per quarter, he to remain in po..aen?ion at ihat rate and the tame agreement continued under plaintiff Before the rale to plaintiff, however, Gray execute 1 a mortgage to detendant, covering, amoug oilier tiling*, the preaa in queation. Two deya hefo'e the aala, detendant waa no tified of plaintilVa claim to the preaa, but notwithntand ing which. !e peraletel in (telling. The defence ia, that the Mle of the pre** not a bona fide tranaaotlon, and that defendant 1< protected by hia mortgage. Verdict for plaint Ifl, f ftof . Samuel Moi'tin as. 'I'm. V. Thla action waa brought to ?? cover I'll*) tor work lahor and material* leatowed and furniahod in DuiUiln^ a house for defend ant. It wan proved, however, hy the plaint! IT* witneaaee, that the work waa perforate. I under a toiled contract, by whirli it waa agreed ilia* lh< mo'ie) nbould lie paid to plaintitl on the proJu :tkio oi tin certificate of the archi tect. 1'lalDtifl contended that he nilgnt aue under the common counta when the work h?d not been done ac coxling to the con'ract taking the contract at the ?ou trolling price for the wor'? dune. IVfeedant insisted that the production id the ar hitert'a certilcate waa a con dition precedent, which the plainer could not waive. Juduireut of nca.au it, with co?t? to lefeadaat /Keotfore K MeJhine on. Sam t el r tbboltunn? Tbia action la hrou?lit n|? n a note for $ia0, parable in monthly inatalmenU ol $-1 eucn, drawn by defendant. The niaaiog of the mite waa ?hn?n >-r plaintiff, hut the defence wai that It waa * tin re accommodation note for which the defendant received no -una deration. Verdict for defencant, wlthcoxta. Kifharri Sai nt, stall rj ,V?. hei'l Lacour. ? Action for com?ni?*ion aa a broker n ootaunog a loan of Ifl, Ota). It appeared that th-> defend . nt totd a trlend of liM, Mr. Tn. Ruwger, that he w ahed to raiae that ?um by mort gate on real ??tate and relucted hi-n to raise It for tlm, Ifjioeaihle. Mr. Tlnrg'-r atmrdtigty advertiaed. and plaint'ff claim a that be waa ematoyeri hy him an broker, aad did raiae tie money for defendant. The Oourt held nm er the teatlmony that there ws < no athirity given by defendant to Burger to nupley ,-vny peraon, aad that he ii sot therefore Uable. Con plalnt .tiamiased, with $10 co?ti. Edgar and Walter fl tall nr. f.'eo rge T Conklin ? The plaintiff aned to recovr a bill for horaa feed, furnished nieberi bytbem to defendant, ;rou> Mae?n to June, 1854. Tlie clerk who kept the no.,', . being lend, the Court al lowed plaintiff to prose the r hoofcs aa correct, by peraona wno had aettleii a :QU 'ita fron- Uiem The defence aat up waa payment ia fuil. t at the testimony being laded site both a* to time an* amo iwt, the Court gave plaintiff judgment for Win :w and e?' ta. Oat-id Trait ell ej. A'or?oa a . J'.-eman ? In NovemSer laat the defeadaat .mid plaln'lf a euant ty of old Jewelry for 91,100, among wl.fr h waa at net e-ghty-tbreetoten of gold pen*, which n'a ntilf alV>,-e t def? ndant warranted to begoM, and that t' ?y were w-trt f'om %3 to g? perdoxen. That be aold a port on of th<m, and tliey were returned to bin aa being of a very infei .or quality, aad aot gold at all. For the deftnor it waa shown that the good* were purchased la a let and that the r"n" were called gold penf ia the trad" aithaugi tbey ?ev? aa Inferior article ? annfactared for the VirfVi# trade, and called the ? Jamee W. TraiiLl n n?n." Tlie Judge, in deciding the ca?e, did not think the warrant** of suck a character aa would jaatlfy a venl.ct for plaintiff. Jadgment for do fiadaat, wi(h coeta. ?Mm CouWb Ckaaboi. Before Hob Judge Thoapioi. Jam. 80. ? Di? |f againit KrU. ? On tM 10th d?x of January, initant, a judgment by default ?u entereJ in tbia action, on motion of Peter W. 'feller, who appeared for the defendant. Mr. Vultee, counsel for the plaintiff, now move* to open that default, and that the plaintiff be permitted to proaecute the action. The only question which arlaee upon the motion is, whether the default ehould be opened, with coat*, to the defendant. Teller bad never been lieensal to practioe aa an attorney in any of the courte of thia State. Counsel for plaintiff sontende therefore, that the defendant ia not entitled to ooate. By the pronaion* of the R. ?#., part 1, coapter 6, title 1, eectiun 1, counsellors and attorney e may b~ licensed to practice in the teveral eourte of law in thia State By title 4, aection 68, of the came chapter, every male citi zen. of the age of twenty-one years, of good moral character, be., may be licensed by the Justice* of the Supreme Court to practise aa attorneys and counsellors in all courts in thie State. By parts, chapter 3, title 1, Heel ion 19, every pereon of full age and sound mini may proaecute or defend an action in perron. By the next section any pereon of good moral character, although not admitted as an attorney, may manage, proaecute or defend a suit for any other person, pioei. ed lit is spe cially authorised tor that purpoee by the party for whom he appears, in writing or by peritonei nomiuation in open ceurt. By the following section, whoever shall in ptrson proteeute or defend aoy suit, Kb ail recover the >ame fees lot any service* performed therein, which he would be entitled to recover If auch services had been performed by an attorney or counsellor. In ail cases where a licensed attorney appears in a -nit or proceed ing the law raisee an implied authority on hie part to do so. In this case there is no proof before me that fel ler had any authority whatever to appear for the de fendant in the action. But even if be bad, neither h? nor the defendant ia entitled to any coats upon this motion. To entitle a party to coats in thia court in any suit or proceed ng, he must either be an attorney of the ?uprt me Court, or he must prosecute or defend m person. And no person can appear in any action, for either party, unless' the court poeaess satisfactory proof that he is either an actorn-y or counsellor at law, or that be haa been specially autborixet to do so in ac cordance with ihe provisions of the statute, it ia due to suitors that this, rule be s'jictly observed ia all case*. Ihe great amount of business here transacted? it* character and importance ? deiranda that the court should enforce every statute calculated to protect the rights and interests of litigating parties. Motion grant ed, without costs Dtaiia is the Hudton River Railrnad Company. ? This acticn is brought to recover the value of two ca<ks of starch. Plaintiff proved that the defendants received the property on the 8th of June last In August or September last, the goods were demanded of an agent of tbe defendants. A memorandum of the agent aQowed that the casks bad been marked for New Hamburg, Dutchess county. Tbe fact was, the gooes had beeu marked for hloomfie d, New Jersey, and had been de livered to tbe defendants by the m.sukeof tne plaintiff's carman fhere was no proof otlered to show that tbe goods had been lost, or that they had not been received ?>y ti e con-igneee. The allega'ion o< t'ie plaintiff s tbat tbe gooda were not delivered to the consignees. Although the allegation ia a negative one, yet some proof i-biiuld bave been introduced to support it. Judg m?nt for tbe defendants. .Rurfc vs. Erani and uthert. ? The plaintiff is a stevedore. 1 be defendant* are the owners of the Uritlsh ship Queen of tbe Avon. In November laat, tbe captain of tbe snip emjloyed tbe plaintiff to load and unloac her cargo. The plaintiff engaged several men and a team to periorm the worn. Ihe time occupied was twenty -seven days. Thisac tien was brought to recover for twenty-aeven days per sonal service of tbe plaintiff The captain agreed to pay tbe plaintiff fifteen shillings per day for each man by bira employed, and three dollars for the team. rhe.-ie ? crvices amounted to about one hundred and ninety dol lars, which had been pai<*. The proof was that when a bos* s'evedore ia engaged to superintend in person the gang he employs, lie receives three dollars per day; other wise, lie receives a shilling a day per man lu thin ease the evidence does not warrant the Court in fin ling tbe fact to be that plaintiff was employed to superintend in person tue loading and discharging of tha vesxel. Judgment for defendants. I'iiiluih, J. ? The testimony in this cane being almost wholly depositions taken de btneeine, 1 have noted there on my ruling on the various objections taken to question and answer, with the proper exceptions. Tbe plaintiff claims to recover in this action, under the rule* of law applicable to innkeepers, and tbe defendants resist, tbe claim on tbe following grounds 1. 1 hut they bave the righi to make rules and regula tions tor the well government of their house, and that their guests are bound to obey them. 2. Tbat under the principle ot law treating innkeepers as eommcn carriers, tbe defendants are o.?Iy liable for sufficient money to cover travelling expenses. aul the moi ey having teen paid plaintiff alter bis arrival here, could it be deemed suchr 3. The money lo*t was acquired by the plaintiff aft?r his arrival at tbe hotel, and ill- detendanta are not liable for anything which was not tbe plaintiff'* at the time he commenced boarding. 4. The plain till came to tbe hotel on the 3d of .Septem ber. andlelton the 19th; it muat, therefore, be oreaame.l tbat lie came there aa a boarder and not as a traveller, and if so riefen lanls are not liable. 6. That tbe defendants bad < esignated a particular place in tbeir hotel for money and valuable* lo be sited, sua given notice that tbey will not be responsible for their safety units* they are so deposited Guest* are bound to take notice of thia rule, or iliey *eep their pro perty at their own riak. Ignorance of thy hn^uage on the part of the pla'nliff is no excuse. Aa questions of fact the defendants contend ? first, that there is no evidence beyond the plaintiff's own de clarations, that he deposited any money in the dressing cate before be went to breakfast; aud, secondly, that there is evidence to warrant a fin .ing tbat tbe plain off ronbed himself. Before considering tbe questions of law I shall dispo-ie of the facts. The evidence of l ierre Clbcins. plaintiff'* cousin, is most positive upon the disposition of the moi ey by plaintiff. lie says:? "My cousin put thirty twenty dollar pieces into his dressing ease; I saw him (hut bis dressing case and lock it; it was strong, very .-troop " Nor is his testimony at aU shaken ou cross examination, for in answer to the question, "How do you know tbe number of piecea of gold which the plain tiff placed m hia dressing case V" he says: ? "Because my cousin said to me, '1 keep Ave i>u -id red franc* fur myself, and 1 put the rest in my dressing case,' Mr. i-tan tiago made the caculation belore me ; my cousin took out of the pile five hundred francs? one hundred dollaia ? and put the rest in his dressing case." With rega'd to the po ut tbat this was a "self-rob bery," I cannot perceive anything in the testimony cal culated to throw tbe slightest shade ot suspicion upon, or tsrniab the fair tame cf, the plaintiff. The robbery seemed to have been the affair almost of a moment. Tlaintlffwent hastily to hi* room for bis eve glass ? rtis co?ered. the robbery, aod in a few moment..' returned without hia coat, highly excited, and complalntd of hla loss. If tbeie was anything in the conduct of the nlain ttO at the time to warrant the suspicion that he was the robber, ft certainly would have attracted the attention of the keen and experienced officer of the house, who, by an immediate tearch of the persons of the parti**, could have ascertained it* truth or lalsity. Nothing, however, aeems to have awakened his suspicion No search was instituted. Nor did the defendants seem to have entertained any doubt a* to the character of the plaintiff, 'as he and hi* friends remained in the hotel some sixteen day* after the robbery. It woul 1 be, then, not only a moat unjust, bnt, to my* mind, an outrage ous assumption, upon tht* testimony, to place any ?tigmaup<ii the plaintiff's integrity. Now, as to the law on which the defendants rely In this case: Hotel keepers have an uncontrolled right to make such regulations as they may deem proper for th* gov ernment of their hotels, but it by no means follows tnat by them they necessarily avoid any legal liability; and this brings up what is really the an important question in tbis case. Was the notice on the dooi of plaintiff's room binding on him, and was he bound to know iUcoa tenta? A mere notice that the defemlanta would not be liable for lose unless the money waa deposited in tbesaf* could not operate at a discharge of any liability by tbein, unlet* that notice waa directly and conclusively in ought to the knowledge of the plaintiff. For all the porf-ae* of thi* action tbe rules and liabilities attached to com hod carriers are to be applied tolnr keeper*. In all eases, then, when tbe notice cannot be brought home to the person interested in tbe good*, directly or constructively, It is a mere nullity: and tbe burden of proof le in tl.o carrier to show that tbe person with whom he deals is fully informed of tbe term* and effect of the notice. ? Brooke vs. Hckwick, 4 lling H. 218. 2 1, reel Kv.. f) lilfl The most uiual evidence to show that the plaintiff haa tail notice of the defendant 'a terms, has been by pmottliata notice waa put up in the office when Ihe foods were received and entered for the pnrpc ae of car riage, in so conspicuous a situation that it must (unless be was guilty of wilful negligence,) have attracted tbe attention of the plaintiff. ? 2 Stark. Kv. 838. And the printed conditions of a line of public coaches were held to be more *nfli<-tently known to tbe passengers by being poated up at the place where they book their names ? Wli teaill ?? Crane, ft Watt* ami S. R 3*9, But this proof fails when the party who deliver* the good* at tbi < t1i. e cannot read.? Pavta v* Willard, 2 Star*. K. 279. Another usual mod* of prouf of notice i* by evi dence that tbe notice wa> given by printed card*; but tils i* insufficient, unU-sa it i* proved tint tie plaintiff has teen thr cards. ? 2 Stark tv. ii iH. JenMn* vs. I lizisrd, 1 Stark K 418. Lee son vs. Uolt 1 riurk. R. 18?'i. In the case of Walk*r vs. the New York and North Mo laud Railway Company, 2 Kills A Hiaca, 7i0, it was proved that tbe defendant* printed notices and sent a clerk to circulate them among dealers? the clerk testi fied thai he believed the plaintiff wa* one of tfoao -o win m he delivered the notice*? and tbe plaintiff after ward* asked tli* station manier wbat tbe defendant* meant by sending that old fellow around with thnso no tices, thus admitting that the notice had been brought to his observation. It waa held in this -ase that t.aving had notice of the limitation of their liability by tbe de fn.dai.ts, aud afterwards sanding freight over their read, it was cone uodera -peeial contract created by tli* notice, bevond which the ilefendanis were not bouu 1. In fact the Term "notice" aeems to bo misapplied m tbese cises. }A "notice" i* valueless unless both parties, the inn keeper sod the truest, act under it. It la a con tract between tl.e parties, and the ooct'lne that ina keeper* and carriers c.innot limit their liability by a mere mtiee. haa become too well settled to b* question ed at this nay. lb* pol ey Of the law ia pUin. It was said by Beet, J In Rrooke v*. Piokw i-k, and the rule wa* fuNy sustained by Judge ISrooson, In HoUieter, v*. Now len. 19 Wend. 274: "If coash proprietor- wish honestly to limit their responsibility, tbey ought to announce their term* to every individual wiio appliea at the r of fice, and, at the ssme time, place in his haod a printed pap< r, specifying tbe prec se extent of their engagement, if tliey omtt to <to thia, they attract customer* ufider the confidence inspired by the extensive I ability which the common !aw imposes upon carrier*, and then endeavor to elude that liability by some limitation whieh they have not neen at the pein* to male known to tbe indi vidual who trnated them." In thie case, tha only proof of notice ia, that the card on whieh it was printed waa posted on the Inside door of plaintiff'* rot m, In a ronap'cuou* place, where he would have been moet likely in have see* it, and that hi* attention wa* catted to it by Use officer after the rob berj. To nb?t thia, it m shown by the evid?ae* of the plaintiff's oo main that tbe plaintiff U a fruekau. ud don not apeak or road the English language? that lio ban bat Juat oomuiecced hla Kngliah studies. Thia notice vu Dot odo of which the plaintiff waa bound to inform timself, but waa oao which tho defendant* wore bound to trial directly home to hla observation and un derstanding, if they wished to avoid tho obligation* un der which they were placed by tho common law aa Inn keepers. A notice, theiefore, in English, la ao notice to a frenchman ignorant of our language. Tho notioa wa* not pouted lor the protection of the guaat, bocauao the shield of the law haa for many generation* been thrown around him, guarding by iron rules hla property ? but for tho protection or tho host. and oare ahould bo taken by him that the contenta of the notion ahould bo fully understood bj every traveller whom he aooomnMX datea. Indeed, it is a matter of great aurpriao that in thia city, the great receiving reservoir of tho travelling public in the Now World, tho proprie tors of our spacious hotels are not m ire careful in this respect, and do not print their noticesln the va helu* may at Hi ft blush seem har h and oppressive. but when it is considered that the traveller Is among stran gers, st the iLt-rcy of servants ol whose Honesty be ia utterly ignorant, it must be admitted thtt the host who profits by his custom stiould be liable for all losses sus tained by the guest under nil roof, without the sufferer being put to the proof as to bow t:ie loss occurred In deed, in a majority ol esse* this proof could uot be ad duced. Chief Justice Holt, in delivering his celebrated . udgment in Coggt vs. Bernard, 'i Lord Kuym, 018, said: ''Ibis is t political establishment, contrived by tho ) olicy of the law , for the .-a'ety ol all persons, the neces sity of wbo-e aflaits oblige tht-iu 10 iruit these aorta of ftersons, that tbey may be safe in their ways of deal ng. " It is comparatively lately that the rlgfl rule* In tills resptct have been so much relaxes a< that innkeep er* and carriers may inu.t their responsibility, by ?iy of a notice, so brought to tbe knowledge of a party tbat he, at least constructively, acts uu.ier it, an<l parties who seek to avail them ? Ives of tins relaxation, must bo Cure ful tbat they bring themselves within the principlea whlch govern it It is aln> claimed that the defendant* are not liable, because the money waa received by the plaintiff after be took board at the hotel. L cannot conreive how this principle can apply- If it be true in respect to mon?y received alter ho became a guest, 'hen tli rule would apply to any additio.-al article of w.rjiooe be migut sub sequently pun ha e The policy ol tbe law is to pro tect all tLe prop rty owned by tbe guest uud in hit pos sess'on in the t.otel, whether acqumd before or after be became a guest. Upon the poiut that the amount of money lost ??> excessive for travell ug expeuaej, anl tba then ior- tb* deiendant.* are nit liable, it is shown tbat tbe pluintlil came hen- on a voyage of cariosity, pleasure uud lul?ruiatiou . tuut his passage from France to New York was paid, and tbat be waa to continue hts travels Irom ik>s city. 1 cannot, therefore, find as a. que-tino uf lact, that was an extravagant amount to be nlloweo for such poroses. lu abort, the plaintilf was a guest ol the deieuiiauta. tie bad in bis possession in his roum on (lie Ud ot >~S|t mber last, #ti >U iu gold, of which he was robbet'. by some person or persons un known and tbe notice, t<y . bich toe delen tants claim to be difcliargtd tr< m all liabd.ty, has not been brought to the plaintiff's knowlei ge n sue.n a way as to seuuro tbat object. No n' gligtnce or mismanagement in con ducting the houne is proven (In the contrary, it up pears tbat an active ami highly intelligent olliuer had a Eeneral supervision of the hotel und thut a watch un ler Is dlrcctim eas kept ou ench floor, but that in spite even of this vigilance t ; y was eifeMe i. Negli gence need not be pi ...ase the dei?-udauts re spnsible; tbe law re in as insurers of the safety ol the property of tx, and I mu-t therefore order judgment let pia ntilT for besides coats and tlie usual allow Antl-SIavcry Lccture-SFn, X< The tenth anti slav. ry Iccturn of the season wm de rl'T i"' 6Venlng m% lhe '?b?rn?oIe, by the Hon. Charle.Franci. Adan:?_B1Jbje.jt: ?' What Mak.sai.v.ry ? Question of N.tion-I Concern. a lar*. aud en,, w Jt prewnt Tne Miowing is a lulef .ketch of tti? lecturer', remark ? It U not my design, he said, to be the campion of any of the institut.ons against slavery, though [would hT\e ?tb'm. *" W"b reP?ct- U however, to grettec, that no much acrimony should har" crept into the aitUlavery .pirlt. I propone to examine to-o.ght, fir<t-what mah- .lavery ? que. tlun of national concern, anJ theo-how should it be treated by the free Stat*, or America I'ome.tc.laveryis established in fltte,n of the Stoto> of this nion, and upwards of tnree millions o.' hnmaa being, are held it, bouo.ge. If sl?Tery goes on lnjre?. " *l r*U ""atitlia* don. during tne p?t eighty year., there will be as many .Uves eighty years henco as the exiting population of the whole Cm ted state. whh^ h t4. 7' ?UU",e tUr"r>' haT' ??thing to do ithit, buti. it true that a number of p5r?ons kept in bondage are going to alfe .t only one pan of tn. ulonf liuve romintnced the Maitaiim I of . "''"eh Die conviction that th.., h J 1 c?uu?t resist have been one d.V an /IILk bH,fun "",t the Missouri compromise ? tot h, T^il't AfU,r ? well with a ,ense of LeXlVdJtv 1 1. .'***? l? timid th? community without a hami v* 1 r'M? from mat.oB i ol a un.on by twelve arsons, ?IN ttfe ^rlZ. Anti-slavery 8< ciety ot lioston " 7 be riaht todo mucb cBLnot be denie.1 ; the nunaer muiht hL a . d'scim, but th.se women SSr?:?Si! s rv- "f V-- iss?-* calling meetings. In utter* u "coooern'0^' committing rwrrcr^i, stakes: A crowd ruhLt-d to the pUce, where fifteen wom?n ?? 1 a*** id bled, and unable t?? iiu<l I boinprton t tier wrealeT did not .tin u/U L u' meetiug. th re. They obliged to protect W ?,. L ('arr.^nfbyTucing'h^wHi wtnln ?T1 'n " Pri'?D 1 hi" ">"? heroines ' ! wtro.n. Iheexcute that this was a local outra.e w.ll '.ss?.rsft! I 'e at'trs e7f* pohtJcsY au.'l luw,?^i^'w^"?tth* SSgsasSgg cause ot fn edom was at Hrst ??. i r? * denominated Uutlc; hot the calmer indent" hi Z politic, acs, the chuA,P?!,e Zl, i^'the^^Sj^ ? 'ate?, the honor of eommennui tne work f bou Id b?- reserved for the bn,w. of thoJl! i?h!._ ?? 1 men. Uii.Uoc OW <lie ev.ut# of the pait twentr'vMrs I Z /?"""? "^u^t on the .(irestion of ?1avr>r/ erm j ' j "'V' ^'ri1 ^Ut* *-t,ie T'^bt of petition to the na ih . *? '* an 1 even now evaded -the acviUltloii of letaa ? ami, above all. the ??1. of the fugitive flnve is*, k, ^T0itil)_ ,!?***?*? ,lb',, ?Btw?,Hrto4 th. meaauAT^f?^ ! ^bern men 1h. .lavVquesttoThi ^..^1 o< national concern from the f?. t n . qoesUoo I fr... , question ?houbl he treated br th? ire. t-tati ? of America we must retl?w its streairiA 1 duelT ih 10 !' " J*1 ba,# ltl* Irieod. ol 'iberty u> pro ? inrihu 1 * Te OD'y 11 1 their command a troth lu eM ??( ' ! rl",n,'t di? The hiMory or the pre du. r. iUr7 '! " hi*UrJ <>' deteau, bi.t|yet one of gr*. dual pr -gres. tow>rd. Sucre s. ' ? * . i,,r- A, *m' concluded his lecture hy alluding to the | leellofr at pr? e?t ealMiuK ag.,?.t Reman C.thol,^ and for. Igners. Attacktag s?y religion, l.e r ^ | in /merica hut ano<her depute is aort'ei, I vote or ^ bold omcr'Toeh'm n" r?,"Btr' 10 I tr-J' t?re ictkiQ ar.0 av that t?i?v .n ' ,ir>" ^ in tbair ! ?? exacts t he otlVer "-'-^el obligati,? whicU I si 1 . ^ ' . l?,*? ?? the abt?*nre of morahtv in I binli ob'^J P**9**" m'n on account of their ' ?iu ilun , i"i""l't"1' ,h*n lh# ?crintural les s'awfv r> iVJti 1 . ?D "" U"B ?'">?" ' ?? 1" .^ I the ^ ;e^n^^,;^:r^r.?r"'l^rt ner. what they m./ht do bot4lr If they plrieedf Hut Uie .lave question I. the question ot l.berty, iJT LlfSi Im t Zf.h"/' *!' ?rr tU* ?orM U,t !'>en, .tin* 1. m\tm "!.?'??'**, aoil 1st u. hope that a ? - ? triumph will eventually be our reward. >*?etnl Long MiDbUto to Kbkd thr Bolmbm on nn Bt.si k Hu.-A gentleman informs the e<titor of the MtM seotWrWr that he has, with. n the laet thirty dnys, shipped snd receipted through to New York, Phlledel phi s and Baltimore. 7.<U0 hmie< long and short middies. The sbippment. of tbU dlm-riptioo by the Madieon fast ers this ? later will reach 10,000 hose. ? about S,iOO,OW> lb. more than fromjany other cltjr on the cooUneet ?f AMrlca.